The statement is a critical commentary on the Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) delay in issuing a warning about the pesticide Dacthal. It expresses concern about the potential health risks associated with the pesticide's use on produce and athletic fields. The statement also implies a commitment to addressing such issues more promptly if the speaker were to become President, indicating a call to action and a policy stance.
- The statement does not appear to do harm with words and actions, but rather raises awareness about a potential public health issue. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others and does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding of a public health concern and implies empathy for those potentially affected by the pesticide. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism of the EPA's actions without personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to highlight a public health issue and suggests a commitment to societal betterment. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech by responsibly using the platform to discuss a matter of public concern with integrity. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.