The statement is part of a conversation about media bias and the dissemination of information, which is a relevant topic in public discourse. The tone is critical and suggests a belief in selective reporting based on political affiliations. The intent seems to be to highlight perceived inconsistencies in media reporting and to question the timing of releasing certain information. The content refers to the funding of the Steele dossier and implies that its delayed disclosure was politically motivated.
- The statement does not appear to do harm with words or actions. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects privacy and does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not actively promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in criticism but does not resort to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement attempts to use influence to highlight issues of media bias, which could be seen as aiming for the betterment of society by advocating for transparency. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform to raise concerns about media integrity. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.