The statement expresses concern over a WHO pandemic treaty, suggesting it could infringe on national rights and freedoms, and criticizes the influence of pharmaceutical companies. The linked article title and description use strong language to emphasize the urgency and importance of the protests in Japan.
- The statement does not appear to intend harm but raises concerns about potential negative consequences of the treaty. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others and does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement lacks a tone of understanding, empathy, and compassion towards the WHO or pharmaceutical companies, but it does not actively promote misunderstanding or lack of compassion.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in criticism of the WHO and pharmaceutical companies but does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement aims to use influence to alert and mobilize against what is perceived as a threat to society's betterment. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech by expressing a viewpoint on a public issue, but the use of strong language such as 'third atomic bomb' could be seen as lacking in responsible use of platform. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.