Ron DeSantis

The statement 'We tell the truth about communism' in conjunction with the provided image detailing the anti-communist education initiatives by Governor DeSantis, constitutes public discourse as it engages with educational policy and historical interpretation, which are substantive public issues.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement aims to promote a specific historical narrative, which could be seen as doing harm if it lacks balance or suppresses differing viewpoints. [-1]
2. Principle 2:

   I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.

   The statement respects the dignity of victims of communism by acknowledging their suffering, but could potentially disrespect the dignity of those who might interpret the history of communism differently.
3. Principle 3:

   I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.

   The statement's intent to educate about the dangers of communism could foster understanding about historical events, but might lack empathy towards differing historical interpretations and experiences. [-1]
4. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   The statement and the associated legislative actions seem to lack a platform for constructive criticism or dialogue, as they promote a singular perspective on communism. [-2]
5. Principle 6:

   I will use my influence for the betterment of society.

   The statement acknowledges historical events and aims to correct perceived gaps in historical education, aligning with the principle of acknowledging and correcting mistakes. [+1]
6. Principle 7:

   I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.

   The use of educational policy to promote a specific historical narrative could be seen as using influence responsibly, but might also be viewed as lacking integrity if it does not encourage critical thinking and open dialogue. [-1]