Reposted by Bret Baier
The statement involves a public figure, President Biden, and references a significant geopolitical issue, which is the prevention of an attack on Haifa. This qualifies as public discourse as it engages with issues of international relations and presidential actions. The statement expresses gratitude towards President Biden for allegedly preventing an attack, which is a substantive engagement with a public issue. The mention of Emil’s Shawarma adds a personal touch but does not detract from the overall context of international diplomacy and security.
- The statement aims to do no harm by positively acknowledging an action intended to prevent violence. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It respects the dignity of those involved by not disparaging any parties. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding by highlighting the significance of international diplomatic actions. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- It engages constructively by expressing gratitude rather than criticism. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The use of influence here is to acknowledge and potentially reinforce the importance of peaceful diplomatic efforts. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech responsibly by discussing actions of a public figure in a public context without misinformation. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.