The statement is a clear example of public discourse as it engages substantively with the issue of the death penalty, a significant public policy issue. It references a report by ReprieveUS, critiques the death penalty on the grounds of cruelty and racial bias, and calls for legislative action.
- The statement aims to do no harm with words and actions by advocating for the abolition of the death penalty, which it describes as 'cruel' and 'racist'. [+2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the dignity of others, particularly marginalized groups, by highlighting racial disparities in the application of the death penalty. [+2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding and compassion by drawing attention to the perceived injustices and urging remedial action. [+2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism of the death penalty and invites dialogue by calling for legislative action, without engaging in personal attacks. [+2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The speaker uses their influence to advocate for what they believe would be a societal improvement, namely the abolition of the federal death penalty. [+2]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement responsibly uses the platform to discuss a significant issue of public policy, upholding the principles of free speech with integrity. [+2]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.