Matt Taibbi

Rank 38 of 47
|
Score -50

The statement is part of a Twitter conversation discussing the impact of policing strategies like stop-and-frisk, particularly on black communities compared to white communities. The user cites personal interviews to support claims about racial disparities in police stops and nuisance offenses, contributing to a broader discussion on racial justice and policing policies.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement aims to inform and clarify disparities in policing without causing harm, supporting the principle of doing no harm with words. [+2]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects the dignity of individuals and communities discussed, avoiding any derogatory language or personal attacks, thus upholding the respect for privacy and dignity. [+2]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    By sharing insights from personal interviews, the statement promotes understanding and empathy towards the experiences of black individuals with law enforcement, aligning with the principle of promoting empathy. [+2]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The user engages in a factual and respectful manner, providing evidence from personal interviews to constructively contribute to the dialogue, adhering to the principle of engaging constructively with those in disagreement. [+2]
  5. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement uses the platform to highlight important societal issues regarding racial disparities in policing, aiming for the betterment of society. [+2]
  6. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The user responsibly uses their platform to contribute to a significant public issue, upholding the principles of free speech and responsible platform use. [+2]