Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
The statement is a call to action against a proposed legislative measure to ban TikTok in the U.S., framing it as an assault on free speech. It directly addresses a public policy issue and encourages public engagement through a political campaign, thus constituting public discourse.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm but is aggressive in its approach, which could polarize opinions.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects privacy and dignity, focusing on policy rather than personal attacks. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement attempts to rally support and create a unified stance against the ban, but it lacks a tone of empathy and understanding for differing viewpoints.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism of the policy but does not invite dialogue with those in disagreement, instead taking a firm stance against supporters of the ban.Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses its influence to mobilize public opinion for what it perceives as the betterment of society by protecting free speech. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech by advocating against censorship and responsibly using its platform to influence public opinion. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.