Reposted by Christopher C. Cuomo
The statement is a critique of U.S. Congressional spending priorities, specifically highlighting the allocation of funds to international causes while implying neglect of border issues. This constitutes public discourse as it engages with public policy and budgetary allocations, which are substantive issues affecting the civic dialogue.
- The statement uses strong language ('not giving a crap') which could be seen as slightly harmful or aggressive, but it does not cause significant harm. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others and does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement lacks a tone of empathy and compassion, focusing instead on criticism without promoting understanding. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in criticism but does not provide constructive dialogue or engage directly with those in disagreement. It also borders on ad hominem by harshly criticizing Congress without engaging in a constructive critique of their decisions. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement aims to use influence to highlight perceived issues in budget allocation, which could be seen as an attempt to better society by calling for attention to domestic issues. However, the approach might not effectively encourage positive change due to its confrontational tone.Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.