Jill Stien

Rank 37 of 47
|
Score -66

The statement 'Who do you think was responsible for the Nord Stream pipeline explosion? Why has this not been investigated?' constitutes public discourse as it engages with a significant international incident involving critical infrastructure. The statement raises questions about accountability and transparency in geopolitical events, which are crucial elements in public policy and security discussions.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement aims to provoke thought and discussion without causing harm, focusing on the need for investigation rather than making unsubstantiated claims. [+1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    It respects the dignity of others by not accusing any individual or group without evidence, maintaining a neutral and questioning stance. [+1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The question promotes understanding by highlighting the lack of clarity and investigation into a significant event, encouraging the audience to think about the implications of such an oversight. [+1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    It fosters constructive dialogue by posing a question that could lead to discussions about international law, sovereignty, and the responsibilities of nations and entities involved in global infrastructure. [+1]
  5. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement uses its platform to raise awareness about a potentially overlooked or under-investigated issue, which could lead to greater scrutiny and accountability. [+1]
  6. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    It upholds the principles of free speech responsibly by inviting discourse on a public interest topic without spreading misinformation or engaging in speculative accusations. [+1]