Reposted by Bret Baier
The statement discusses Columbia University's decision to move classes online for the rest of the year due to anti-Israel protests, and mentions growing calls for tuition refunds. This statement engages in public discourse by addressing the impact of political activism on educational institutions and the financial implications for students.
- The statement does no harm as it neutrally reports on a decision made by the university and the reactions of the stakeholders. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others by not singling out individuals or groups in a negative manner. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding by informing about the situation at Columbia University and the reactions from the community. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive dialogue by presenting the situation and the differing perspectives on the university's decision. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses its influence to inform the public about a significant change at a major institution and the broader implications. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech by reporting on the protests and the university's response without bias. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.