Bret Baier

Rank 22 of 47
|
Score 45

The statement by @AbeGreenwald engages in public discourse as it addresses a significant public issue involving international conflict, terrorism, and the responses of protest groups. The tone is critical and provocative, aiming to challenge the perceived biases in public reactions to the conflict between Israel and Hamas. The content specifically criticizes the focus of protestors on Israel while ignoring the actions of Hamas, which the author describes as initiating the conflict.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement might indirectly cause harm by polarizing opinions further, although it does not directly incite violence or harm. [-1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others in a general sense, as it does not target individuals but discusses groups and their actions.
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement lacks a tone of empathy and compassion, focusing instead on criticizing one side's supporters sharply. [-1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    While the statement engages in criticism, it borders on confrontational rather than purely constructive, as it questions the motives and focuses of protestors without opening a dialogue for understanding differing perspectives. [-1]
  5. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement uses influence to highlight perceived injustices and biases in public discourse, aiming to correct what the author sees as a skewed narrative. [+1]
  6. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds free speech by expressing a controversial opinion responsibly, contributing to the broader dialogue on the issue. [+1]