Reposted by Bret Baier
The statement highlights a perceived inconsistency in the U.S. administration's policy towards Israel, contrasting statements made by Secretary of State Antony Blinken and humanitarian envoy David Satterfield. The statement aims to critique and bring attention to what the author perceives as a double standard in foreign policy.
- The statement aims to hold public officials accountable by highlighting discrepancies in their statements, which is a fundamental aspect of doing no harm in public discourse. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the dignity of the individuals involved by focusing on their professional roles and statements without personal attacks. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- By bringing attention to inconsistencies in policy statements, the statement promotes understanding and potentially encourages a more informed public dialogue. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism by pointing out discrepancies in official statements, which could foster dialogue on foreign policy consistency. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement is based on quoted remarks from public figures, suggesting an effort to accurately represent their positions, which aligns with acknowledging and correcting mistakes if needed. [+1]Principle 5:I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.
- The statement uses the platform to scrutinize public policy, contributing responsibly to public discourse on foreign policy. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.