Reposted by Bret Baier
The statement by the FBI Director addresses a significant public safety concern regarding the potential for terrorist attacks similar to a recent event in Russia. This is a clear example of public discourse as it involves a substantive engagement with public issues, specifically national security and terrorism.
- The statement aims to inform and alert the public without causing unnecessary panic, thus adhering to the principle of doing no harm with words. [+2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects privacy and dignity, focusing on general security concerns without targeting any specific group unfairly, thus avoiding cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- By informing the public about potential threats, the statement promotes understanding and preparedness, which can foster a sense of community and mutual concern. [+2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement is factual and does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments, maintaining a professional and constructive tone. [+2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The FBI Director uses his influence to alert and prepare the public, which aligns with using influence for the betterment of society. [+2]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement responsibly uses the platform of public communication to inform and engage the public on serious issues, upholding the principles of free speech with integrity. [+2]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.