Mike Johnson

Rank 29 of 47
|
Score 5

The statement is a critical commentary on the perceived failure of Columbia University's administration to ensure student safety, specifically mentioning Jewish students. It calls for the resignation of President Shafik and highlights congressional concern over the issue.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement aims to address harm by highlighting the issue of student safety and alleged targeting of Jewish students, which is a significant concern. [+2]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects the dignity of the students by advocating for their safety and addressing the issue of targeted harassment. [+2]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The call for action promotes understanding and compassion towards the affected students, emphasizing the need for a safe educational environment. [+2]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive criticism by pinpointing specific leadership and calling for accountability, which could lead to dialogue about leadership effectiveness and campus safety policies. [+2]
  5. Principle 5:
    I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.
    The statement implicitly acknowledges a problem and seeks correction by calling for leadership change. [+1]
  6. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The use of a public platform to address this issue reflects an attempt to use influence for societal betterment, particularly in the context of educational safety. [+2]
  7. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds principles of free speech responsibly by using the platform to address a public concern without resorting to personal attacks. [+2]