Jill Stien

Rank 38 of 47
|
Score -82

The statement 'This is fascism Joe Biden’s fascism' in response to an image of DPS troopers in riot gear is a strong political assertion. It constitutes public discourse as it engages with issues of governance, law enforcement, and political leadership.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement may indirectly cause harm by using charged language ('fascism') that could escalate tensions or misunderstandings without providing a clear, factual basis or context for such a serious accusation. [-1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects the privacy of individuals as it does not target any individual personally but criticizes a public figure in the context of their political role.
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The use of the term 'fascism' without substantiation may not promote understanding or compassion, as it likely polarizes rather than educates or fosters dialogue. [-1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue. It makes a sweeping claim without engaging in a reasoned argument or providing evidence. [-2]
  5. Principle 5:
    I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.
    There is no indication of an acknowledgment or correction of mistakes, as the statement is assertive without elaboration.
  6. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The use of inflammatory language in a public discourse context may not be using influence for the betterment of society, as it could contribute to division rather than solutions or understanding. [-1]
  7. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement uses the platform to express a view, which is a right, but it may not be done with integrity if the claim is unsubstantiated and presented in a way that could mislead or incite. [-1]