In reply to:
Keith Bloemendaal
@contractorkeith
·
209d
The statement is part of a conversation about book publishing options, specifically self-publishing versus hybrid models. It offers advice and shares personal insights into the publishing process, which can be considered a form of public discourse as it engages in a discussion that could be of public interest to those involved in or considering publishing.
- The statement aims to be helpful and informative, indicating a desire to do no harm. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects privacy and dignity, focusing solely on publishing options without any negative comments about individuals or groups. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- By offering to guide and clarify the publishing process, the statement promotes understanding and potentially empathy among those new to publishing. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages constructively, providing alternatives and personal insights without any personal attacks or derogatory comments. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The advice given aims to use the speaker's experience for the betterment of others considering publishing, which could positively impact their professional endeavors. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.