Reposted by Ayanna Pressley
The statement 'Denying access to representative literature is discrimination, and it is not only discrimination, it is dangerous.' made during the #CantBeErased event addresses the issue of book bans and censorship in education. It argues that restricting access to diverse literature is a form of discrimination and poses a threat to society. The statement is part of a broader campaign against book bans, as indicated by the linked campaign toolkit which provides resources for action against such censorship.
- The statement promotes understanding and awareness about the implications of book bans, contributing positively to public discourse on censorship and education rights. [+2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It respects the dignity of all individuals by advocating for equal access to literature, thus supporting the principle of respecting others' dignity. [+2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement encourages empathy towards those affected by book bans, aligning with the principle of promoting empathy. [+2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- By calling for action against censorship, it engages in constructive dialogue and encourages civic participation, which is in line with promoting constructive criticism and dialogue. [+2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses its platform to advocate for societal improvement by fighting against censorship, thus upholding the principle of using influence for the betterment of society. [+2]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.