Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
Writers Against the War on Gaza
@wawog_now
·
612d
The statement and associated images depict a protest by students at City College of New York (CCNY), part of the City University of New York (CUNY) system. The students are shown having erected an encampment and engaging in actions to push NYPD officers off the campus. The statement links the police presence on campus to broader issues of repression and international conflict, specifically the situation in Palestine. This statement is part of public discourse as it engages with issues of police presence in educational institutions, student activism, and international solidarity.
- The statement aims to inform and possibly mobilize support, reflecting an intent to influence public opinion and actions regarding police presence on campus and its broader implications. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- While the statement respects the dignity of the protesters by portraying their actions in a positive light, it may not fully respect the dignity of the NYPD officers involved, as it simplistically portrays the interaction without context of the officers' intentions or instructions. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding of the students' perspective and their reasons for protest, which fosters empathy towards their cause. However, it lacks a balanced view that might also explain the police's perspective or the reasons for their presence. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in a form of constructive criticism of NYPD's involvement with CCNY. However, the linkage of local police presence to international issues like genocide without detailed explanation may not foster constructive dialogue but could polarize opinions.Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement does not acknowledge the complexity of the issues involved, such as the reasons for NYPD's presence and the nuances of international conflicts like that in Palestine. [-1]Principle 5:I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.
- The use of the platform to highlight issues of perceived injustice and student activism contributes positively to societal discourse. However, the broad and potentially inflammatory comparisons might not serve the best societal interests.Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement uses the platform to raise important issues but could be seen as lacking in integrity by not providing a balanced perspective or sufficient context for the claims made. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.