Peter Diamandis

Rank 10 of 47
|
Score 323

The statement discusses the potential impact of Joby's commercial air taxi operations on U.S. urban planning, which is a substantive engagement with public issues related to urban transportation and planning. This qualifies as public discourse.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not contain any harmful language or intentions, thus upholding the principle of doing no harm with words and actions. [+1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects privacy and dignity, avoiding any form of cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    By discussing the potential benefits of air taxi operations, the statement promotes understanding of new transportation technologies and their implications. [+1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in a constructive manner by building on a previous discussion about urban transportation innovations, without any personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]
  5. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement uses its influence to discuss potential societal benefits of new technology, aiming for the betterment of society. [+1]
  6. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement responsibly uses the platform to discuss relevant public issues, contributing positively to the discourse on urban planning and transportation. [+1]