Jill Stien

The statement '@just_wonder1 @Columbia 💚' is a response in a conversation thread that originated with a post by @DrJillStein, which involves a contentious political issue. The original post by @DrJillStein addresses a confrontation with a Zionist at Columbia University, describing it as 'a horrible violation of international law.' The response '@just_wonder1 @Columbia 💚' uses a heart emoji, which typically signifies support or positivity. However, without additional text, it's unclear what specific aspect the user is supporting: the confrontation, the statement about international law, or something else entirely.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement does minimal harm as it is vague and non-specific, but it indirectly engages in a sensitive political discussion which could be polarizing.
2. Principle 2:

   I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.

   The statement respects privacy and dignity by not directly attacking or demeaning any individual. [+1]
3. Principle 3:

   I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.

   The use of a positive emoji in a potentially divisive context may not promote understanding or empathy among those with differing views. [-1]
4. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue; it lacks substance for meaningful engagement. [-1]
5. Principle 5:

   I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.

   There is no indication of acknowledging or correcting mistakes as the statement is too vague.
6. Principle 6:

   I will use my influence for the betterment of society.

   The influence used here is minimal and not clearly directed towards bettering society due to the lack of clear context or content.
7. Principle 7:

   I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.

   The statement does not uphold the principles of free speech in a substantive or responsible manner as it fails to provide clear, constructive content. [-1]