The statement 'Confronting a Zionist @Columbia U' by @DrJillStein, which includes an image of Jill Stein speaking about what she perceives as a violation of international law, constitutes public discourse. It engages with a contentious and significant political issue, specifically the Israeli-Palestinian conflict and its international legal implications.
Principle 1:
I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.The statement aims to highlight perceived legal and ethical issues, which is a form of advocacy intended to inform and influence public opinion. However, the use of the term 'Zionist' in a confrontational context could potentially incite or exacerbate tensions, which might be seen as harmful.
[-1]Principle 2:
I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.The statement respects the dignity of others to a degree but fails to foster a respectful dialogue due to its confrontational tone.
[-1]Principle 3:
I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.The statement lacks a tone of empathy and compassion, focusing instead on confrontation.
[-1]Principle 4:
I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.The statement engages in a critical dialogue but does so in a manner that might not encourage constructive criticism or inclusive discussion.
[-1]Principle 5:
I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.The statement does not acknowledge different perspectives or the complexity of the issue, which could be seen as a failure to correct or broaden the understanding presented.
[-1]Principle 6:
I will use my influence for the betterment of society.The statement uses influence to highlight important issues but may not contribute positively to societal betterment if it leads to increased division or misunderstanding.
[-1]Principle 7:
I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.The statement upholds the principle of free speech but may not use this platform with the necessary integrity to ensure a balanced and respectful discourse.