Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
The statement discusses a significant public issue involving the suppression of a pro-Palestine encampment at Ohio State University, including the arrest and alleged physical mistreatment of students by police. This issue touches upon civil rights, law enforcement conduct, and freedom of expression.
- The statement highlights a potential harm to students, which is crucial for public awareness but could be seen as harmful if not substantiated by evidence. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the dignity of the students involved by bringing attention to their treatment, though it lacks specific details that could fully contextualize the actions of the police. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement aims to promote understanding and compassion towards the students, but could benefit from a more balanced view that includes perspectives from law enforcement for comprehensive empathy.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in a critical dialogue about the actions of the police, which is essential for civic engagement, though it could further enhance dialogue by including more diverse viewpoints. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses its influence to highlight a potentially unjust situation, advocating for societal betterment through awareness. [+2]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech by reporting on and questioning the actions of authority figures, contributing to a responsible use of platform. [+2]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.