Jill Stien

The statement 'Confronting a Zionist @Columbia U' by @DrJillStein, accompanied by an image of Jill Stein speaking about a 'horrible violation of international law', constitutes public discourse as it engages with a significant political and social issue. The statement and the image suggest a critical stance on certain political actions or policies, which is a matter of public concern and debate.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement aims to highlight perceived injustices and could be seen as an attempt to prevent harm by advocating for international law. However, the confrontational language ('Confronting a Zionist') might be perceived as aggressive and could potentially incite division rather than constructive dialogue.
2. Principle 2:

   I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.

   The statement respects the dignity of others to a limited extent. While it does not directly attack any individual, the use of 'Zionist' in a confrontational context might be viewed as targeting a specific group, which could be seen as disrespectful. [-1]
3. Principle 3:

   I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.

   The statement lacks a tone of empathy and compassion, focusing instead on confrontation. This approach may not promote understanding among differing viewpoints. [-1]
4. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   The statement engages in a form of criticism but does so in a manner that might not encourage constructive dialogue due to its confrontational tone. [-1]
5. Principle 5:

   I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.

   There is no indication of acknowledgment or correction of mistakes, as the statement is assertive and does not suggest openness to other perspectives.
6. Principle 6:

   I will use my influence for the betterment of society.

   The use of a public platform to discuss violations of international law aligns with using influence for societal betterment, assuming the intent is to promote justice and adherence to international norms. [+1]
7. Principle 7:

   I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.

   The statement upholds the principle of free speech by using the platform to express concerns about international law, though the confrontational approach may limit responsible and constructive use of this freedom.