The statement engages in public discourse by discussing the accessibility of high finance to ordinary readers through a Substack Q&A series titled 'Fringe Finance.' The use of colloquial language ('shit burger') aims to demystify and perhaps criticize complex financial topics in a manner that is relatable to a general audience. The statement also includes a link to a narrated version of the article, enhancing accessibility.
Principle 1:
I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.The statement aims to inform and educate the public on financial matters, which is beneficial. However, the use of slang ('shit burger') could be seen as potentially harmful or offensive, detracting from the educational value.
[-1]Principle 2:
I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.The statement respects the dignity of others by aiming to empower readers with knowledge, though the language used might not align with traditional notions of respect.
Principle 3:
I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.The colloquial language used in the statement attempts to make the content more relatable, which could foster understanding among those who might feel alienated by traditional financial discourse.
[+1]Principle 4:
I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.The statement promotes understanding by making complex information more accessible, though the effectiveness of this approach can vary based on individual perceptions of the language used.
[+1]Principle 5:
I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.The statement acknowledges the complexity of financial topics and attempts to address these in a simplified manner, which is a form of correcting widespread misunderstandings or lack of knowledge.
[+1]Principle 7:
I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.The use of informal language in discussing serious topics like finance demonstrates a unique approach to using the platform, which could be seen as both innovative and potentially irresponsible depending on the audience's expectations for financial discourse.