The statement discusses an alleged incident involving Jill Stein, a public figure, where she is claimed to have been charged with assaulting a police officer, but video evidence suggests she was instead assaulted by police during an anti-genocide protest. The statement is critical of the charges and implies a miscarriage of justice, aiming to correct what the speaker sees as a false narrative.
Principle 1:
I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.The statement aims to highlight a perceived injustice and correct public understanding, which aligns with doing no harm.
 [+2]Principle 2:
I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.It respects the dignity of Jill Stein by attempting to clarify the circumstances of her interaction with law enforcement, supporting her right to protest.
 [+2]Principle 3:
I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.The statement promotes understanding by providing context to the incident, which could foster empathy towards Jill Stein and others in similar situations.
 [+2]Principle 4:
I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.It engages in constructive criticism of the charges against Jill Stein, encouraging dialogue about police conduct and the rights of protesters.
 [+2]Principle 5:
I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.The statement acknowledges the existence of video evidence, which supports its call to correct the narrative around the incident.
 [+1]Principle 6:
I will use my influence for the betterment of society.By discussing the charges against a public figure in the context of a protest, the statement uses its platform to highlight broader issues of justice and law enforcement interaction with civilians.
 [+2]Principle 7:
I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.The statement responsibly uses the platform to discuss a matter of public interest, contributing to the civic dialogue on police conduct and protest rights.
 [+2]