Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
The statement discusses the arrest of Jill Stein and the use of force by police during a protest, suggesting political motives behind the arrest. It touches on issues of law enforcement, political freedom, and the integrity of democratic processes.
- The statement could potentially harm individuals or groups by suggesting without evidence that Democrats are jailing opponents to win elections, which could incite distrust and division. [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not respect the dignity of the individuals involved, particularly by making unverified claims about the motives behind law enforcement actions. [-2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement lacks a tone of empathy and understanding, instead promoting a divisive narrative. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not promote constructive dialogue or a balanced discussion on the incident, focusing instead on a partisan accusation. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- There is no indication of an effort to verify or correct the information shared, which could be misleading. [-1]Principle 5:I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.
- The use of this statement in public discourse may not contribute positively to society but rather foster division and misinformation. [-2]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement does not uphold principles of responsible free speech, as it potentially spreads unverified and accusatory information. [-2]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.