Ron DeSantis

The statement is a critical commentary on the Biden Administration's changes to Title IX, accusing it of abusing constitutional authority and harming women and girls. The statement is part of a broader public discourse on government policy and its implications.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement could potentially cause harm by framing policy changes in a highly contentious and possibly misleading way, which might incite strong opposition without a balanced discussion of the facts. [-1]
2. Principle 2:

   I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.

   The statement respects the dignity of those it aims to defend (women and girls) but could be seen as disrespectful towards those implementing the changes by accusing them of abuse of power without a nuanced explanation. [-1]
3. Principle 3:

   I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.

   The statement lacks a tone of empathy and understanding towards differing viewpoints on the Title IX changes, presenting a one-sided view that may not foster comprehensive understanding. [-1]
4. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   The statement engages in criticism but does not encourage constructive dialogue or offer solutions, focusing instead on opposition. [-1]
5. Principle 6:

   I will use my influence for the betterment of society.

   The use of influence to challenge a policy could be seen as beneficial if it leads to a review and possible improvement of the policy. However, the confrontational tone might not contribute positively to societal betterment.
6. Principle 7:

   I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.

   The statement uses its platform to challenge perceived misuse of power, which aligns with responsible use of free speech, but it could improve in integrity by providing a more balanced view. [+1]