The statement involves a call to action by Columbia alumni urging the university president to involve law enforcement to address a situation described as a 'pro-terror mob' and to suspend faculty who support it. This statement is a part of public discourse as it engages with issues of university governance, law enforcement involvement in academic settings, and the broader implications of labeling protest movements.
- The call for police intervention and suspension of faculty could potentially escalate conflicts and harm individuals involved, thus not fully adhering to the principle of doing no harm. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the safety concerns of the alumni but could be seen as lacking respect for the dignity of those labeled as part of a 'pro-terror mob' and the faculty who support them. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- While the statement aims to address perceived issues on campus, the labeling as 'pro-terror' may reduce empathy and understanding towards those involved in the protest. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does engage in a form of dialogue by using an open letter, but the terms used and the demands made might not foster constructive criticism or dialogue. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement does not provide evidence or context for the claims made, which could be seen as a failure to acknowledge and correct potential misinformation. [-1]Principle 5:I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.
- The alumni are using their influence to prompt action, but whether this is for the betterment of society is debatable given the potential for increased conflict and misunderstanding.Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement uses the platform of an open letter to engage with public issues, which aligns with responsible use of influence, though the approach and language used may undermine this intent. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.