Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
The statement discusses a serious and contentious issue involving alleged police inaction and disproportionate response to protests at UCLA, highlighting concerns about police behavior and political bias in a 'blue' state. The statement is critical of the police's handling of the situation, suggesting a failure to protect certain groups while aggressively targeting others.
- The statement aims to raise awareness about perceived injustices and police misconduct, which is crucial for public accountability. However, the language used could be seen as somewhat inflammatory, which might detract from constructive discourse. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the dignity of the protesters by advocating for their rights and highlighting what the author perceives as unfair treatment. However, it does not provide specific evidence or a balanced view of the police's actions, which could affect the overall respect for all parties involved.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding of the protesters' plight but lacks empathy towards the police, potentially polarizing the issue further rather than fostering a balanced understanding. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- While the statement criticizes the actions of the police, it does not engage in constructive dialogue or suggest solutions, focusing instead on condemning the actions observed. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement does not acknowledge any counterpoints or complexities of the police's situation, which might be crucial for a fully informed critique. [-1]Principle 5:I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.
- The statement uses its platform to highlight potential social injustices, aligning with the principle of using influence for societal betterment, though the approach could be more balanced. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds the principle of free speech by using the platform to express concerns about public safety and justice, though the integrity of the discourse could be enhanced by a more balanced and less charged presentation. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.