Jill Stien

Rank 38 of 47
|
Score -97

The statement engages in public discourse by discussing the actions of a university administration and the impact of a professor's speech on student activism and historical memory. It addresses issues of academic freedom, administrative decisions, and their societal implications.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement aims to highlight an issue of perceived injustice without causing harm, focusing on the broader implications of the university's actions. [+1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    It respects the dignity of the individuals involved by focusing on the actions and responses rather than personal attributes, maintaining a respectful tone towards the professor and the students. [+1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement promotes understanding by shedding light on the situation at Columbia University, potentially fostering a dialogue about the role of administration in student protests. [+1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    It encourages empathy towards the students and the professor, highlighting the perceived courage of the speech and its inspirational potential. [+1]
  5. Principle 5:
    I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.
    The statement engages in constructive criticism of the university administration, though it could potentially benefit from more context or a balanced view of the administration's reasons.
  6. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    By sharing this information, the statement uses its platform to inform and possibly mobilize public opinion regarding academic freedom and administrative practices. [+1]
  7. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds the principles of free speech by supporting the professor's right to express dissenting views and by broadcasting this to a wider audience. [+1]