Matt Taibbi

Rank 32 of 47
|
Score -20
5/2/2024, 7:00:01 PM
X
In reply to:
Gilles Jaunes Deleuze
@CarolinaDellaV3
·
501d
@mtaibbi Who's speech are the protestors shouting down or blocking? Nobody's

The ones doing that are the pro-Israel provocateur thugs who are only there to do damage and intimidate
Alejandra Caraballo
@Esqueer_
·
502d
It's so incredibly clear that the police stood aside and let a pro Israeli lynch mob run wild at UCLA. They did nothing for two hours as violent Zionists assaulted students, launched fireworks into the encampment, and sprayed mace on students.
Matt Taibbi
@mtaibbi
·
501d
@CarolinaDellaV3 No, I’m all for protests, just not for shouting people down or blocking others’ speech. And I’m not only against the antisemitism bills aimed at pro-Palestine protests, I’ve been writing about censorship of Palestinians for years
Gilles Jaunes Deleuze
@CarolinaDellaV3
·
501d
@mtaibbi Taibbi's such a fascist prig...he only likes the free speech that fits his hardening views

imagine referring to protests as "disruptions." He would have hated the Civil Rights and anti-Vietnam war protests
Matt Taibbi
@mtaibbi
·
501d
Yes, I think the House antisemitism bill and measures in states like Georgia and Texas are awful. My point is you might get more sympathy for lost 1A protection if there were fewer disruptions, shut-downs, human chains, and “heckler’s veto” actions, also affronts to free speech
Graeber Thoreau
@SteveilKnevil
·
501d
@mtaibbi Wow you've been having shit take after shit take lately. Our 1st amendment is being attacked because of the genocide and people calling Zionists and our own government out about it. Dude wtf is wrong with you? Did you take some Zionist money we don't know about?

The statement in question is part of a complex and multi-layered conversation on Twitter regarding free speech, protests, and the role of different groups in these protests. The user mentions an incident involving Rutgers president Justin Holloway being shouted down and requiring a police escort, attributing this and other disruptions primarily to pro-Palestinian protesters. This statement engages in public discourse by discussing the impact of protests on free speech and public safety.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement attempts to highlight concerns about safety and the functioning of public events, which is a valid concern in public discourse. However, it could potentially harm by attributing negative actions predominantly to a specific group without broader context, which might perpetuate stereotypes or biases. [-1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects the dignity of the individuals involved by not using derogatory language but fails to provide a balanced view of the events, which could indirectly disrespect the groups mentioned by portraying them predominantly in a negative light. [-1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement lacks a tone of empathy and understanding towards all parties involved in the protests, focusing more on the disruptions caused rather than the reasons behind the protests. [-1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does engage in a form of dialogue by responding to another user's comments, but it could be more constructive by acknowledging the complexities of the situation rather than primarily focusing on disruptions.
  5. Principle 5:
    I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.
    There is no indication that the user acknowledges or corrects any potential misinformation or bias in their statement, which could be important in such a heated and complex discussion. [-1]
  6. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The user uses their platform to raise a concern about public safety and free speech, which is a responsible use of influence. However, the potential bias in the portrayal of the groups involved could be seen as a less constructive use of their platform.
  7. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds the principle of free speech by defending the right of individuals to engage in town halls without being shouted down. However, it could further enhance its integrity by providing a more balanced perspective on the motivations and actions of all parties involved. [+1]