Matt Taibbi

Rank 32 of 47
|
Score -20
5/3/2024, 12:21:19 AM
X
In reply to:
Private Citizen
@cit20097
·
503d
@mtaibbi Occupying a space is not infringing on people’s rights. It’s an inconvenience. They’re not disrupting critical infrastructure at universities. In this case they are protesting something so egregious that inconvenience is justified. The university should have just agreed to divest
Matt Taibbi
@mtaibbi
·
503d
I think it’s not a numerical contest and when you’re respectful of others’ rights, you’re doing something for you, not for them. You’re protecting something that belongs to you as well as them.
TonyBoloney
@TonyBoloney4
·
503d
@mtaibbi you think Zionists and pro-Israel folks have their rights neglected in America?
Is it even close to be a fair game between the 2 positions?

The statement by @cit20097 addresses the methods and ethics of protest, particularly in the context of university divestment movements. It critiques certain disruptive tactics used in protests, arguing that they may infringe on others' rights and ultimately undermine the protesters' cause. The statement is part of a broader conversation about the balance between protest rights and the rights of those potentially affected by such protests.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement promotes non-harmful methods of protest, aligning with the principle of doing no harm with words and actions. [+2]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    By advocating for respect for others' rights during protests, the statement supports the dignity and privacy of individuals, aligning with this principle. [+2]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement encourages a thoughtful approach to protest that considers the impact on others, fostering understanding and compassion. [+2]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    It engages in constructive criticism of protest tactics, encouraging dialogue about effective and respectful methods, thus adhering to this principle. [+2]
  5. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement aims to use influence to promote more effective and respectful protest tactics, which could be seen as contributing to the betterment of society. [+1]
  6. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    It responsibly uses the platform to discuss public issues related to protest rights and methods, upholding the principle of responsible free speech. [+1]