Matt Taibbi

Rank 32 of 47
|
Score -20

The statement discusses the firing of Nathan Cofnas from Emmanuel College at Cambridge University following his controversial views on 'race realism' and its necessity to counter 'the woke left.' The statement also mentions the support from prominent philosophers for Cofnas' right to free speech, framing it as a broader issue of academic freedom and opposition to DEI (Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion) policies.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement could potentially harm individuals or groups by promoting divisive and controversial views on race, which might incite or justify discrimination. [-2]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects the privacy of the individuals involved by not disclosing sensitive personal information, but it challenges the dignity of others by endorsing a contentious stance that many consider harmful. [-1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, particularly in its divisive framing of the issue and the endorsement of 'race realism,' a concept widely regarded as pseudoscientific and racist. [-2]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in a form of dialogue by reporting on a debate within the academic community, but it does so in a manner that might polarize rather than foster constructive discussion. [-1]
  5. Principle 5:
    I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.
    The statement acknowledges the controversy surrounding Cofnas' views and the resultant actions by the college, which is a form of acknowledging the broader debate. [+1]
  6. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The use of the platform to discuss this issue could be seen as an attempt to influence societal views on free speech and academic freedom, but it may also be perceived as promoting harmful ideologies under the guise of defending free speech. [-1]
  7. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds the principle of free speech by defending Cofnas' right to express his views, but it may compromise integrity by failing to critically address the implications of the views being defended. [+1]