Reposted by Robert F. Kennedy Jr
The statement claims that Facebook, YouTube, and Amazon implemented censorship policies due to pressure from the Biden administration. It suggests a direct influence of government on the content moderation policies of these major platforms, framing it as a response to threats or pressure rather than a voluntary compliance with legal or ethical standards. The statement is critical of this alleged influence, implying a breach of free speech and a manipulation of public discourse by the government.
- The statement could potentially harm reputations and public trust in both the government and the mentioned companies by suggesting unethical collusion. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of the entities involved by not disclosing sensitive personal information beyond what is necessary for the claim. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The tone of the statement is accusatory and may not promote understanding or empathy, but rather division and skepticism towards the entities involved. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in a critical dialogue, which is a form of constructive criticism, although it could be seen as one-sided.Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement does not acknowledge the complexities of content moderation or the potential legitimate reasons for the companies' actions, which might be seen as a failure to correct or acknowledge mistakes or nuances. [-1]Principle 5:I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.
- The use of the statement in public discourse could influence opinions and societal attitudes towards government intervention in private companies, potentially fostering distrust without sufficient evidence. [-1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement challenges the integrity of the Biden administration and the companies, questioning their commitment to free speech and responsible use of power. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.