The statement is part of a public discourse on AI policy and its global impact, featuring a discussion between Peter Diamandis and Eric Schmidt. The content is focused on substantive issues related to government handling of AI technologies, including deepfakes, and its implications on global policies.
Principle 1:
I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.The statement promotes a responsible discussion on AI policy, aiming to do no harm by informing and educating on the subject.
[+2]Principle 2:
I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.It respects the dignity of others by maintaining a professional tone and focusing on the topic without derogatory comments or personal attacks.
[+2]Principle 3:
I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.The discussion encourages understanding and compassion by explaining complex topics like AI policy and its effects, making it accessible to a broader audience.
[+2]Principle 4:
I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.The dialogue between Peter and Eric is constructive, focusing on the implications of AI without devolving into unproductive criticism.
[+2]Principle 5:
I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.The statement acknowledges the complexities of AI policy, suggesting a nuanced approach to understanding and addressing these issues.
[+2]Principle 6:
I will use my influence for the betterment of society.By discussing the impact of AI on a global scale, the statement uses its influence to better inform the public and policymakers.
[+2]Principle 7:
I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.The responsible use of the platform to discuss AI policy upholds the principles of free speech, contributing positively to public discourse.
[+2]