In reply to:
Andrew Dolgin
@Dolgin_Andrew
·
503d
Matt Taibbi
@mtaibbi
·
503d
The statement by @Dolgin_Andrew in response to the conversation about censorship and free speech issues related to Facebook and governmental pressure is a part of public discourse. It addresses the consistency of political figures in their stance on free speech, highlighting perceived hypocrisy and the broader implications of such actions on rights and public policy.
- The statement aims to contribute to a discussion on free speech and political consistency without causing harm. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It respects the dignity of others by focusing on the actions and policies rather than personal attacks. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The comment promotes understanding by pointing out the commonality of certain behaviors across political divides, which could foster a more nuanced view of the issue. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- Engages in constructive criticism by questioning the consistency of free speech advocacy among political figures. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement is open and contributes to correcting broader misunderstandings or one-sided views on free speech advocacy. [+1]Principle 5:I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.
- It uses the platform to discuss important societal issues like free speech and political integrity. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech by participating in a public discussion without suppressing opposing views. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.