In reply to:
Matt
@skipwiley11
·
500d
The statement '@skipwiley11 Because why now? Name something I did that’s not “legit.”' is part of a larger conversation on Twitter that involves discussions about journalism, language use in academia, and historical concepts like imperialism. The statement itself is a defensive response to a critique of the speaker's current status as a journalist compared to their past. This conversation can be considered public discourse as it involves a debate about journalistic integrity and the role of language in shaping public perception.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but is defensive in nature, which might not contribute positively to the discourse.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others, avoiding any personal attacks or derogatory language. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement lacks a tone of understanding, empathy, or compassion, focusing instead on defending personal legitimacy. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in a form of dialogue, though it could be seen as somewhat confrontational rather than fully constructive. It does not resort to personal attacks but does not foster a constructive critique or dialogue.Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.