Matt Taibbi

Rank 33 of 47
|
Score -35
5/5/2024, 7:29:47 PM
X
In reply to:
NKriss
@NTKriss
·
497d
@replyguy123 @mtaibbi @WSWS_Updates @StatusCoup @DemSocialists @Consortiumnews Hey, that's not true! Matt has been very clear that he thinks those laws are less important than the real threat to free speech, left-wing cancel culture.
Bernie fan
@replyguy123
·
497d
@mtaibbi @WSWS_Updates @StatusCoup @DemSocialists @Consortiumnews The greatest threat to free speech comes from Republicans across the country who have been busy banning books for the past few years, and you haven't said jack shit about it.
Matt Taibbi
@mtaibbi
·
497d
The funny thing is I’ve been extremely critical of the Republicans over FISA and the new antisemitism bill. And I’ve always defended people on the left who’ve been censored, from the @WSWS_Updates to @StatusCoup to @DemSocialists to @Consortiumnews and so on. Frustrating
JC
@JcbCrz
·
497d
@mtaibbi @briebriejoy Why are they turning against you?? Krystal and Kyle talked some shit too about you only criticizing democrats when it came to free speech on their episode this week. No grace for Taibbi? You’ll get it from me and others for sure but, sad to see “friends” unable to give it.

The statement is part of a multi-layered conversation on Twitter addressing the issue of free speech, censorship, and the banning of books. It specifically contrasts the scale and impact of book laws with digital censorship programs and criticizes the focus of certain political groups on these issues. The statement also touches on the topic of antisemitism, although it is cut off and not fully developed in the provided text.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement aims to clarify misconceptions about the scale of book laws versus digital censorship, striving to correct misinformation without causing harm. [+1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects the dignity of others by focusing on the issue rather than attacking individuals, though it slightly challenges the knowledge of those with opposing views. [+1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    It attempts to promote understanding by highlighting differences in the scale of censorship issues, though it could be more empathetic in addressing why others might view the situation differently.
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    Engages in constructive criticism by focusing on the issue and not resorting to personal attacks, though it implies a lack of knowledge on the part of others, which could be seen as slightly dismissive.
  5. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The user uses their influence to discuss significant societal issues like censorship and antisemitism, contributing to a broader dialogue on important topics. [+1]