Matt Taibbi

Rank 34 of 47
|
Score -42
5/5/2024, 8:06:03 PM
X
In reply to:
C Dahlberg
@logicrafting
·
424d
@BlueBob53 @mtaibbi @kthalps I keep thinking the same thing and that's why I find Matt incredibly disingenuous with his reasons for avoiding this topic. On the old show with Katie, they would have talked about this every week. FWIW, I suspect the difference is audience capture/fear.
BlueBob53
@BlueBob53
·
425d
@mtaibbi Dude, you co-hosted Useful Idiots with @kthalps , you could very easily, very quickly educate yourself about the Israel-Palestine conflict if you chose.
Matt Taibbi
@mtaibbi
·
425d
Who invented the term “settler colonialism”? It’s redundant. Can you have colonialism without settlers?
.
@Rebelofakind
·
425d
@mtaibbi Respectfully, "I don't know a lot about this issue" is a bullshit excuse. 1/ bc you don't actually HAVE to have intimately studied the decades of tit-for-tat in order the understand the very basic, underlying concepts of ethnic cleansing, genocide, settler colonization, apartheid

The statement in question is part of a multi-layered conversation on Twitter regarding the avoidance of discussing certain topics, specifically the Israel-Palestine conflict, in media and public discourse. The statement expresses frustration over being ascribed financial motivations for actions or stances, particularly in relation to discussing or avoiding specific topics. The conversation touches on issues of media integrity, audience influence, and the personal motivations of public figures in their professional conduct.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement aims to clarify personal motivations and defend against accusations, which indirectly contributes to a broader discussion about media ethics and responsibility. [+1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects the dignity of the individual by defending their personal integrity and motivations. [+1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement promotes understanding by explaining the speaker's position and motivations, which can foster a more nuanced view of their actions. [+1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    While the statement is defensive, it engages in the dialogue about media responsibility and personal integrity, contributing constructively to the conversation. [+1]
  5. Principle 5:
    I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.
    The statement acknowledges the speaker's consistent stance on the issue, which aligns with correcting misconceptions about their motivations. [+1]
  6. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement uses the platform to clarify misunderstandings and defend the speaker's professional integrity, which can be seen as using influence responsibly. [+1]
  7. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds free speech by participating in a public discussion and expressing personal views and clarifications. [+1]