Matt Taibbi

Rank 34 of 47
|
Score -42
5/6/2024, 12:15:47 PM
X
In reply to:
Matt Taibbi
@mtaibbi
·
424d
If you read the reports there was very little about which "side" was suppressed more. There was some chatter within the company about it, and some current and former executives talked about it with us, but mainly we focused on the who/how of censorship (2/5)
Matt Taibbi
@mtaibbi
·
424d
You obviously didn't read the reports (@lhfang is a right-wing ideologue?). We went out of our way to show censorship/manipulation taking place across the spectrum, mentioning everyone from the Green Party to the Yellow Vests to Truthout and Consortium News. (1/5)
Chairman Runks
@acmonks
·
424d
@mtaibbi @WSWS_Updates @StatusCoup @DemSocialists @Consortiumnews I just noticed it was you I was replying to-sorry You can’t believe Musk was being honest with you still?

The statement is part of a Twitter conversation discussing the involvement of various U.S. government agencies (FBI, DHS, GEC, ODNI, DOD, HHS) in content flagging, particularly in relation to elections and COVID-19. It highlights specific actions like the creation of fake accounts by the DOD and the role of these agencies in monitoring content. This discussion is rooted in concerns about censorship and manipulation of information, which are significant public issues.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement aims to expose potential misuse of power without causing harm, focusing on the actions of government agencies rather than individuals. [+2]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    It respects privacy and dignity by discussing institutional actions without targeting or exposing individuals. [+1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    By shedding light on government activities, the statement promotes understanding of how public entities might influence public discourse. [+2]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement is part of a constructive dialogue about censorship, contributing to a broader discussion without personal attacks. [+2]
  5. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement uses its influence to inform the public about significant issues, potentially leading to better-informed societal decisions. [+2]
  6. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement responsibly uses the platform to discuss free speech and censorship, crucial elements of democratic societies. [+2]