The statement constitutes public discourse as it engages with the issue of campus management and policy at Columbia University, particularly in the context of protests and their impact on university events like the commencement ceremony. The statement is critical and addresses the actions of university administrators and the behavior of certain groups on campus.
- The statement accuses the university administration and certain groups of allowing harmful behavior, which could be seen as an attempt to do harm with words by labeling and generalizing without clear evidence. [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not respect the dignity of those involved, grouping all protestors and certain faculty as 'terrorist-sympathizing' without distinction, which could incite further conflict or misunderstanding. [-2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement lacks an effort to promote understanding or compassion, instead using divisive language that could exacerbate tensions. [-2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in a form of dialogue by critiquing the university's actions, but it fails to constructively address disagreements, using charged language that might be seen as a personal attack rather than a reasoned argument. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses its influence to criticize and possibly sway public opinion against the university administration and certain groups, but it does so in a manner that may not necessarily better society, particularly if it spreads misinformation or unnecessary division. [-1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- While the statement uses the platform to speak on a public issue, the lack of integrity in the presentation of information and the divisive tone could be seen as an irresponsible use of free speech. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.