The statement in question is a response to a claim made by @froomkin regarding Joe Kahn's stance on the media's role in elections. The statement corrects a perceived misinterpretation by providing a quote from Joe Kahn that emphasizes the media's duty to inform voters without directing their voting choices. This discussion is part of a broader debate on the responsibilities of the media in democratic societies, making it a substantive engagement in public discourse.
Principle 1:
I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.The statement aims to clarify Joe Kahn's position on the media's role, contributing to a more accurate public understanding and thereby doing no harm.
[+2]Principle 2:
I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.It respects the dignity of Joe Kahn by correcting misinformation about his views, thus upholding his reputation and the integrity of his statements.
[+2]Principle 3:
I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.By providing a direct quote from Kahn, the statement promotes understanding and clarifies the media's role in democracy.
[+2]Principle 4:
I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.The statement engages constructively by correcting a misinterpretation, fostering a more informed dialogue.
[+2]Principle 5:
I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.The correction of misinformation demonstrates a commitment to acknowledging and correcting mistakes in public discourse.
[+2]Principle 6:
I will use my influence for the betterment of society.The statement uses its influence to correct public misconceptions, contributing positively to societal understanding of media ethics.
[+2]Principle 7:
I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.It upholds the principles of free speech by facilitating an informed discussion on the media's role without suppressing differing viewpoints.
[+2]