The statement addresses a public issue involving the cancellation of a university commencement due to protests, comparing the response of Columbia University to the proactive measures taken by Florida's colleges and universities. The statement criticizes Columbia University's decision and highlights a contrasting policy approach in Florida, emphasizing the importance of uninterrupted educational ceremonies.
- The statement uses somewhat harsh language ('sad and pathetic') which could be seen as harmful or dismissive towards the reasons behind the protests, potentially violating the principle of doing no harm with words. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the dignity of the students by advocating for their right to a commencement ceremony, but it could be seen as lacking respect for the protesters by dismissing their concerns as merely disruptive.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding or empathy towards the protesters or the reasons behind the university's decision, focusing instead on criticism and a contrasting policy. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in a form of criticism but could be seen as bordering on a personal attack against Columbia University by using terms like 'sad and pathetic.' This might detract from constructive dialogue. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to advocate for the betterment of society by ensuring that educational achievements are celebrated without disruption. This aligns with using influence positively. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.