Matt Taibbi

Rank 34 of 47
|
Score -42
5/7/2024, 1:29:14 AM
X
In reply to:
Askracher
@askracher
·
427d
@mtaibbi Imo this phase is unlike others in that the ICs are directing the MSM with far more control
Matt Taibbi
@mtaibbi
·
427d
Sure, but it’s gone through phases. Journalism had a decent run for a while in terms of factuality. Even when it had serious bias issues, it was generally too embarrassed to just make things up, particularly about people with the ability to sue.
Keith Dorschner
@keith_dorschner
·
427d
@mtaibbi Matt, yellow journalism is as old as the hills.

Your profession has always been sketchy.

The statement '@askracher I think that’s probably right' is a brief affirmation in response to a previous comment in a conversation about the influence of intelligence communities on mainstream media. The conversation itself touches on the integrity and historical context of journalism, suggesting a critique of current journalistic practices. However, the specific statement in question does not substantively engage with these issues but rather provides a simple agreement without further elaboration or analysis.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does no harm as it is a neutral agreement without any harmful content. [+1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects privacy and dignity, containing no elements of cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not actively promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it lacks substantive content.
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue beyond agreeing with the previous comment, nor does it contain personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
  5. Principle 5:
    I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.
    There is no indication of acknowledging or correcting mistakes, as the statement does not present any claims or assertions.
  6. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement does not use influence for societal betterment, as it does not contribute significantly to the discourse.
  7. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds the principles of free speech in a responsible manner, though it does not use the platform to engage deeply with the issue. [+1]