Matt Taibbi

Rank 34 of 47
|
Score -42
5/7/2024, 2:02:51 AM
X
In reply to:
Jessie S. - silenceonthelam.bsky.social
@silenceonthelam
·
427d
@Blanca @mtaibbi …I don’t remember precisely the evolution, as it wasn’t all at once. More recently tho, I’ve learned way more from threads & scrolling thru hundreds of accompanying quote tweets, esp re: experiences I hadn’t even imagined existing prior to reading. …
Jessie S. - silenceonthelam.bsky.social
@silenceonthelam
·
427d
@Blanca @mtaibbi The one that’s really tall, listing the different types of colonialism? I can see where it reads that way b/c it refers to “colonizer” as opposed to “colonialism”.

I used to read such things as judgments & had emotional reactions until I dove in & explored the uncomfortable…
Blanca
@Blanca
·
427d
@silenceonthelam @mtaibbi Just go read the ridiculous laundry list. It's totally moral judgement. You don't want to see it bec you are part of it. You are part of academia or indoctrinated by it—high up on your ivory tower with no idea of how the world works.

I use the word woke and am not "far right".
Jessie S. - silenceonthelam.bsky.social
@silenceonthelam
·
427d
@Blanca @mtaibbi …to poison learning that which threatens power as smthg that shd offend & to “other” the “woke” as the problem dividing everyone (in reality, it’s the actual elite—billionaires—whose $ trickles into pockets of those pushing this).

Structural descriptions, not moral judgments.
Jessie S. - silenceonthelam.bsky.social
@silenceonthelam
·
427d
@Blanca @mtaibbi “fair weather left” (aka liberals, Dems, establishment) who might be for something nominally (if no consequence) but often really concerned w/ words & presentation as much or more than the subject matter.

This campaign started in bad faith (tho now often pushed unwittingly) …
Jessie S. - silenceonthelam.bsky.social
@silenceonthelam
·
427d
@Blanca @mtaibbi Never said you weren’t. The “woke” (a word purposely co-opted by a far right disinfluencer—from AAVE & means “aware”, gen re: structural racism, etc) are not making people hate each other; it’s those painting that narrative, taking ppl out of context, or hammering anecdotes of…

The statement is part of a complex thread discussing societal issues such as perceptions of colonialism, the role of academia, and the impact of certain narratives on public understanding and division. The conversation touches on deep societal and ideological divides, reflecting on how different groups interpret and react to terms and concepts related to social justice and historical analysis.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement attempts to moderate the conversation by suggesting respect for differing opinions, which aligns with the principle of doing no harm. [+1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects the dignity of others by advocating for the acceptance of different viewpoints without engaging in harassment or derogatory language. [+1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    While the statement calls for respect, it lacks a proactive approach to promote deeper understanding or empathy between the differing viewpoints.
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement encourages a respectful dialogue and refrains from personal attacks, aligning with engaging constructively with those in disagreement. [+1]
  5. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement indirectly contributes to societal betterment by promoting a more respectful discourse, although it could be more impactful by fostering greater understanding. [+0.5]