Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
Robert F. Kennedy Jr
@RobertKennedyJr
·
424d
The statement involves a critique and comparison of political figures' willingness to engage in debates, which is a part of public discourse as it addresses political behavior and public figures' engagement with media and public opinion.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm but uses a sarcastic tone which could be seen as slightly negative.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects privacy and dignity, focusing only on public actions of the figures involved. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement lacks a tone of understanding, empathy, or compassion, primarily focusing on criticism. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in a form of criticism but does not provide constructive dialogue or a basis for understanding differing viewpoints. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement attempts to use influence to highlight perceived inconsistencies in political behavior, which could be seen as aiming for betterment by advocating for consistency and transparency. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement uses the platform to discuss public figures and their actions, which is a responsible use of free speech, but the sarcastic tone might not fully align with integrity.Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.