Cornel West

Rank 5 of 47
|
Score 315

The statement discusses Evergreen State College's decision to divest from Israel, linking it to the legacy of Rachel Corrie, a former student known for her activism. The statement frames this action as a continuation of Corrie's spirit and activism, emphasizing themes of solidarity and moral stance.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement aims to inform and engage on a specific policy decision by a university, which is a matter of public interest, especially in the context of international relations and human rights. [+1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    It respects the dignity of Rachel Corrie by acknowledging her activism and tragic death, although it could be seen as using her legacy to promote a specific political agenda, which might not align with everyone's view of respecting an individual's legacy.
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement promotes understanding and compassion towards the cause Rachel Corrie supported, but it may polarize opinions due to the complex and contentious nature of Middle East politics.
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    While it implicitly invites dialogue by announcing a significant institutional decision, the framing might limit constructive criticism and dialogue by presenting the divestment as a continuation of a universally accepted moral legacy. [-1]
  5. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement uses its influence to highlight a significant act of solidarity with a political cause, aiming to inspire similar actions or support. [+1]
  6. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement responsibly uses the platform to discuss a public policy decision, though the alignment with integrity could be contested based on personal views on the issue. [+1]