Joanna Rogers
@joannarobertsro
·
432d
The statement in question critiques the nature of online discourse, particularly focusing on the sensationalism and polarization that often characterizes political and media discussions. It suggests that the reality of most situations is not as extreme or divisive as presented in media and online platforms. The statement also implies that various groups and media outlets may exploit these divisive narratives for their own benefit, which can distort public perception and understanding.
- The statement aims to do no harm by criticizing the harmful nature of sensationalist media and divisive online discourse. It encourages a more grounded perspective. [+2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It respects the dignity of others by advocating for a more realistic and less divisive portrayal of news and events, countering the dehumanizing effects of extreme polarization. [+2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding and compassion by highlighting the discrepancy between media portrayals and reality, urging people to consider a more nuanced view of events. [+2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- It engages in constructive criticism of media practices and the nature of online discourse, fostering a dialogue about the impact of these elements on public perception and discourse. [+2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement acknowledges the complexity of reality versus online portrayals, which can be seen as an effort to correct misconceptions and encourage a more accurate understanding. [+2]Principle 5:I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.
- By critiquing sensationalist and divisive tactics, the statement uses its influence to advocate for a more balanced and less sensational approach to public discourse. [+2]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- It upholds the principles of free speech responsibly by using the platform to discuss the implications of media behavior on public discourse and perception, rather than spreading further divisiveness. [+2]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.