In reply to:
The statement in question is a response to a post about censorship and shadow banning, linking personal health and self-examination to national destiny. It praises the leadership of Aubrey Marcus and references a biblical proverb to underscore the value of steadfast friendship and support.
- The statement does no harm and is supportive in nature, promoting a positive message. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It respects the dignity of others, specifically praising an individual for their contributions. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding and compassion through its supportive tone and biblical reference. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- While it does not engage in a direct dialogue with opposing views, it maintains a respectful and constructive tone.Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement is straightforward and does not necessitate a correction of factual mistakes. [+1]Principle 5:I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.
- It uses influence positively by acknowledging and supporting leadership in public health and personal development. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement responsibly uses the platform to express support and does not misuse it for harmful purposes. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.